Mrs Aneuryna's Trans World

  My feelings about birth sex and its relationship to biological sex. Birth Sex I would think the basic definition of SEX is very straight forward when applied to what has been described as the straight jacketed   term birth sex. I fail to see how birth sex and its corresponding birth certificate can be relevant. I have always been led to understand that within law being able to prove a point is a corner stone. I was born in 1946; I would imagine that any Mid-wife or doctor in volved in my birth will be by now deceased. So, there is no way to say whether or not they had recorded my birth accurately. On the other had If the same method of visual inspection is applied today there will be no doubt that I am female. Certainly when I was born in 1946 the entry recorded on a birth certificate was defined by the visual judgement made by the doctor or mid wife at the time of birth. If the child had a penis then he was a boy, and visa versa if the child had a vulva   she was...

  I have, since the Supreme Court Judgment knocked me side ways back on 26 th April 2025, as they say a date that will go down in infamy, been so upset as to just why the attack on the trans community has been so vicious and vindictive. It just did not make any sense at all, and even more so when Trans women with GRCs seemed to be at the centre of the Roth. Just what is so wrong with a person   genuinely needing to have sex reassignment surgery to get their life on track, and why did this hate appear to emulate from Scotland and the north of England. The press is quick to post pictures of the right wing women’s views, one struck me as being far from fact was a placard saying “ HUMANS CAN’T CHANGE SEX”, Well I for one certainly have, and since being born in 1946 we can replace SEX on their placard with so many surgical procedures that have been developed in my life time, like   “HUMANS CAN’T RECEIVED A HEART BYPASS OPERATION OR HEART TRANSPLANT”   or “HUMANS CAN’...